What is the difference between lenin and marx

Unlike Communism, it does not believe in practical implementation. In fact, it can be said that practical implementation of the theoretical ideas of Marxism led to the formation of Communism. On the other hand, Leninism aims at the implementation of both political and socialist economic theories that have been developed from Marxism. It is thus important to know that Leninism was developed by and was named after the Russian revolutionary and political leader Vladmir Lenin. The term Leninism came to be used as early as It was Grigory Zinoviev who popularized Leninism in the year at the fifth congress of the Communist International otherwise called as Comintem.

Leninism was how Lenin changed Marxism to fit Russia. So, in practicality, Leninism was more practical than Marxism as it carried the changes necessary to fit into an actual country. However, Leninism took place in a country which was not so developed or advanced as Marx imagined. Russia at the time was not economically advanced and was populated by a large number of farmers. That is why Lenin has to change aspects of Marxism to fit the Russia at that time. However, that is not the case with Marxism as Marxism talks of a country that is already industrialized and advanced.

This was based on several assumptions. Firstly, Marxism believed that the capitalist states will not let people move towards socialism. This will create revolutionary wrath in the working class which would make them go for a revolution. However, Lenin did not agree with this. He argued that such capitalist states would have enough power that they will use to suppress any revolutionary feelings in the working class.

Leninism says that the capitalist states will give just enough money and benefits to the working class so that they will NOT have revolutionary feelings. Without revolutionary feeling, there will be no revolution. Leninism believed that a party should be formed to guide people because otherwise the revolution happening will not be a practical idea. Lenin attempted to form his own interpretation of this ideology to lead the proletarian October Revolution in his home country of Russia in The ideology that Marx developed was chiefly theoretical in nature.

He believed that these changes were necessary to make Marxism work in Russia. Lenin was forced to look at economic matters in much more detail than Marx. Economic and industrial development became a key task in Leninism, while Marx had assumed that his revolutions would take place in countries that already had well-developed industrial and financial infrastructures.

Marxist theory held that proletarian revolution was inevitable in capitalist states, as ruling states would suppress moves toward socialism, thus incurring the revolutionary wrath of the working classes. Lenin argued that the expansion of imperialism meant that the working classes never developed this revolutionary consciousness -- the expanding powers and wealth of the industrialized nations meant they could provide their working classes with just enough capital and benefits to dampen any revolutionary feelings.

Marx believed that the working classes would spontaneously develop class consciousness and push for proletarian revolution. Lenin did not believe this, and he supported the formation of a political party to inform the working classes and direct their efforts against the capitalist system. Lenin believed that it would take an organized and professional political party to break the workers from the capitalist trade-union mindset into a truly revolutionary state of mind.

It was for these reasons that he formed the Bolshevik Party, which seized power in Russia in